You're currently viewing an old version of this dataset. Data files may not match the old version of the metadata. View the current version.

Effects of roads on small-mammal movements: opportunities and risks of vegetation management on roadsides.

Roads can block animal movement and reduce persistence of species living in road surroundings. Movement restrictions on local populations may even increase extinction risk of abundant small mammals. However, road verges (road managed area between the edge of the road and the beginning of private land) may provide refuge and corridors for small mammals when properly managed. Information on the effects of roads and roadside management on small-mammal movement is still scarce for low traffic roads (<20,000 vehicles per day) crossing well-preserved habitats. We aimed to fill this gap by comparing fine-scale movement patterns of wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) in a road and in a similar roadless area without management. Both areas consisted of a well-preserved Mediterranean agro-silvo pastoral system. We studied several movement patterns: road crossings, verge use, length, and direction of movement. Additionally, we assessed how roadside management, animals’ sex and residency status, season and microhabitat affect movement at the road area. At the roadless area, we defined a virtual road and verges at equivalent locations to the road area for comparison purposes. We gathered capture-mark-recapture data for two years to characterize movement patterns. Wood mice tended to avoid the road by crossing it less often and moving away from it more frequently than from equivalent locations in the roadless area. Wood mice used road verges more frequently than virtual verges and moved more often parallel to the road than to the virtual road. Road crossings were more frequent after firebreak openings (strips of mowed land) in surrounding areas and near taller shrubs. Also, males used road verges more often than females. Differences on several movement patterns between areas and their trends within the road area can be explained mainly by the presence of the road and roadside vegetation management (e.g., firebreaks openings). We suggest roadside vegetation management practices (e.g., avoid land mowing; maintain vegetation strips) to promote the role of verges as refuges and/or corridors for small mammals.

Datos y Recursos

Cite como

Galantinho A. Santos S. Eufrázio S. Silva C. Carvalho F. Alpizar-Jara R. y Mira A. Effects of roads on small-mammal movements: opportunities and risks of vegetation management on roadsides. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115272

Clipboard Icon
Recuperado: 07 Oct 2026 01:29:54
Información básica
Tipo de recurso Texto
Fecha de creación 23-05-2025
Fecha de última modificación 25-06-2026
Mostrar histórico de cambios
Identificador de los metadatos a3331ea5-0c01-54cf-b014-39f45f7947a4
Idioma de los metadatos Español
Temáticas (NTI-RISP)
Categoría del conjunto de alto valor (HVD)
Categoría temática ISO 19115 (inspire)
URI de palabras clave
Información bibliográfica
Nombre del autor Galantinho, A., Santos, S., Eufrázio, S., Silva, C., Carvalho, F., Alpizar-Jara, R. y Mira, A.
Identificador alternativo DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115272
Identificador del autor
Email del autor
Web del autor
Procedencia
Declaración de linaje
Perfil de Metadatos
Legislación aplicable
Conformidad
Conjunto de datos de origen
Frecuencia de actualización
Fuentes
  1. Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 316
  2. pag. 115272
Propósito
Pasos del proceso
Cobertura temporal (Inicio)
Cobertura temporal (Fin)
Notas sobre la versión
Versión
Vigencia del conjunto de datos