Cambios
En el instante 25 de junio de 2026, 12:39:47 UTC,
-
Modificado el valor del campo
modified
a2026-06-25
en Natura 2000 sites, public forests and riparian corridors: the connectivity backbone of forest green infrastructure. -
Modificado el valor del campo
modified
del recurso Acceso al recurso a2026-06-25
(anteriormente2026-06-23
) en Natura 2000 sites, public forests and riparian corridors: the connectivity backbone of forest green infrastructure.
| f | 1 | { | f | 1 | { |
| 2 | "access_rights": | 2 | "access_rights": | ||
| 3 | .europa.eu/metadata-codelist/LimitationsOnPublicAccess/noLimitations", | 3 | .europa.eu/metadata-codelist/LimitationsOnPublicAccess/noLimitations", | ||
| 4 | "alternate_identifier": "DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.002", | 4 | "alternate_identifier": "DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.002", | ||
| 5 | "author": "de la Fuente, B., Mateo-S\u00e1nchez, M.C., | 5 | "author": "de la Fuente, B., Mateo-S\u00e1nchez, M.C., | ||
| 6 | Rodr\u00edguez, G., Gast\u00f3n, A., P\u00e9rez de Ayala, R., | 6 | Rodr\u00edguez, G., Gast\u00f3n, A., P\u00e9rez de Ayala, R., | ||
| 7 | Colomina-P\u00e9rez, D., Melero, M. y Saura, S.", | 7 | Colomina-P\u00e9rez, D., Melero, M. y Saura, S.", | ||
| 8 | "author_name": "de la Fuente, B., Mateo-S\u00e1nchez, M.C., | 8 | "author_name": "de la Fuente, B., Mateo-S\u00e1nchez, M.C., | ||
| 9 | Rodr\u00edguez, G., Gast\u00f3n, A., P\u00e9rez de Ayala, R., | 9 | Rodr\u00edguez, G., Gast\u00f3n, A., P\u00e9rez de Ayala, R., | ||
| 10 | Colomina-P\u00e9rez, D., Melero, M. y Saura, S.", | 10 | Colomina-P\u00e9rez, D., Melero, M. y Saura, S.", | ||
| 11 | "classification_variables": { | 11 | "classification_variables": { | ||
| 12 | "es": "" | 12 | "es": "" | ||
| 13 | }, | 13 | }, | ||
| 14 | "conforms_to": [ | 14 | "conforms_to": [ | ||
| 15 | "https://www.boe.es/eli/es/res/2013/02/19/(4)" | 15 | "https://www.boe.es/eli/es/res/2013/02/19/(4)" | ||
| 16 | ], | 16 | ], | ||
| 17 | "contact": [ | 17 | "contact": [ | ||
| 18 | { | 18 | { | ||
| 19 | "email": "organismo@example.org", | 19 | "email": "organismo@example.org", | ||
| 20 | "name": "Organismo publicador del Cat\u00e1logo", | 20 | "name": "Organismo publicador del Cat\u00e1logo", | ||
| 21 | "role": | 21 | "role": | ||
| 22 | e.ec.europa.eu/metadata-codelist/ResponsiblePartyRole/pointOfContact", | 22 | e.ec.europa.eu/metadata-codelist/ResponsiblePartyRole/pointOfContact", | ||
| 23 | "uri": | 23 | "uri": | ||
| 24 | "http://datos.gob.es/recurso/sector-publico/org/Organismo/EA0000000", | 24 | "http://datos.gob.es/recurso/sector-publico/org/Organismo/EA0000000", | ||
| 25 | "url": "https://organismo.example.org/" | 25 | "url": "https://organismo.example.org/" | ||
| 26 | } | 26 | } | ||
| 27 | ], | 27 | ], | ||
| 28 | "contact_email": "organismo@example.org", | 28 | "contact_email": "organismo@example.org", | ||
| 29 | "contact_name": "Organismo publicador del Cat\u00e1logo", | 29 | "contact_name": "Organismo publicador del Cat\u00e1logo", | ||
| 30 | "contact_role": | 30 | "contact_role": | ||
| 31 | e.ec.europa.eu/metadata-codelist/ResponsiblePartyRole/pointOfContact", | 31 | e.ec.europa.eu/metadata-codelist/ResponsiblePartyRole/pointOfContact", | ||
| 32 | "contact_uri": | 32 | "contact_uri": | ||
| 33 | "http://datos.gob.es/recurso/sector-publico/org/Organismo/EA0000000", | 33 | "http://datos.gob.es/recurso/sector-publico/org/Organismo/EA0000000", | ||
| 34 | "contact_url": "https://organismo.example.org/", | 34 | "contact_url": "https://organismo.example.org/", | ||
| 35 | "created": "2025-05-23", | 35 | "created": "2025-05-23", | ||
| 36 | "creator": [ | 36 | "creator": [ | ||
| 37 | { | 37 | { | ||
| 38 | "name": "de la Fuente, B., Mateo-S\u00e1nchez, M.C., | 38 | "name": "de la Fuente, B., Mateo-S\u00e1nchez, M.C., | ||
| 39 | Rodr\u00edguez, G., Gast\u00f3n, A., P\u00e9rez de Ayala, R., | 39 | Rodr\u00edguez, G., Gast\u00f3n, A., P\u00e9rez de Ayala, R., | ||
| 40 | Colomina-P\u00e9rez, D., Melero, M. y Saura, S." | 40 | Colomina-P\u00e9rez, D., Melero, M. y Saura, S." | ||
| 41 | } | 41 | } | ||
| 42 | ], | 42 | ], | ||
| 43 | "creator_user_id": "d24a314a-79ce-48c0-abd9-54cb42706da4", | 43 | "creator_user_id": "d24a314a-79ce-48c0-abd9-54cb42706da4", | ||
| 44 | "dataset_scope": "non_spatial_dataset", | 44 | "dataset_scope": "non_spatial_dataset", | ||
| 45 | "dcat_type": "http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text", | 45 | "dcat_type": "http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text", | ||
| 46 | "encoding": "UTF-8", | 46 | "encoding": "UTF-8", | ||
| 47 | "featured": false, | 47 | "featured": false, | ||
| 48 | "graphic_overview": | 48 | "graphic_overview": | ||
| 49 | //ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0264837718X00040-cov200h.gif", | 49 | //ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0264837718X00040-cov200h.gif", | ||
| n | 50 | "groups": [], | n | 50 | "groups": [ |
| 51 | { | ||||
| 52 | "description": "La fragmentaci\u00f3n del h\u00e1bitat se define | ||||
| 53 | como el proceso durante el cual una gran extensi\u00f3n de | ||||
| 54 | h\u00e1bitat se transforma en una serie de parches m\u00e1s | ||||
| 55 | peque\u00f1os de menor superficie total aislados entre s\u00ed por una | ||||
| 56 | matriz de h\u00e1bitats distinta de la original", | ||||
| 57 | "display_name": "Fragmentaci\u00f3n del h\u00e1bitat", | ||||
| 58 | "id": "10439641-6830-4144-a3ab-117add931cd5", | ||||
| 59 | "image_display_url": | ||||
| 60 | e_2010_UE_Illustr.jpg/320px-Green_infrastructure_2010_UE_Illustr.jpg", | ||||
| 61 | "name": "fragmentacion-habitat", | ||||
| 62 | "title": "Fragmentaci\u00f3n del h\u00e1bitat" | ||||
| 63 | } | ||||
| 64 | ], | ||||
| 51 | "hvd": "non_hvd", | 65 | "hvd": "non_hvd", | ||
| 52 | "id": "40e79341-3b87-5927-91ee-2dab140533f6", | 66 | "id": "40e79341-3b87-5927-91ee-2dab140533f6", | ||
| 53 | "identifier": "40e79341-3b87-5927-91ee-2dab140533f6", | 67 | "identifier": "40e79341-3b87-5927-91ee-2dab140533f6", | ||
| 54 | "inspire_id": "", | 68 | "inspire_id": "", | ||
| 55 | "isopen": true, | 69 | "isopen": true, | ||
| 56 | "language": | 70 | "language": | ||
| 57 | "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/language/SPA", | 71 | "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/language/SPA", | ||
| 58 | "license_id": "cc-by", | 72 | "license_id": "cc-by", | ||
| 59 | "license_title": "Creative Commons Attribution", | 73 | "license_title": "Creative Commons Attribution", | ||
| 60 | "license_url": "http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by", | 74 | "license_url": "http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by", | ||
| 61 | "lineage_process_steps": [], | 75 | "lineage_process_steps": [], | ||
| 62 | "lineage_source": [ | 76 | "lineage_source": [ | ||
| 63 | "Land Use and Policy. Vol. 75", | 77 | "Land Use and Policy. Vol. 75", | ||
| 64 | "pags. 429-441" | 78 | "pags. 429-441" | ||
| 65 | ], | 79 | ], | ||
| 66 | "maintainer": "", | 80 | "maintainer": "", | ||
| 67 | "maintainer_name": "", | 81 | "maintainer_name": "", | ||
| 68 | "metadata_created": "2026-06-23T14:57:09.314262", | 82 | "metadata_created": "2026-06-23T14:57:09.314262", | ||
| n | 69 | "metadata_modified": "2026-06-23T16:09:40.581305", | n | 83 | "metadata_modified": "2026-06-25T12:39:47.335252", |
| 70 | "metadata_profile": [ | 84 | "metadata_profile": [ | ||
| 71 | "https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/" | 85 | "https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/" | ||
| 72 | ], | 86 | ], | ||
| 73 | "miteco_data_population": { | 87 | "miteco_data_population": { | ||
| 74 | "es": "" | 88 | "es": "" | ||
| 75 | }, | 89 | }, | ||
| 76 | "miteco_data_territory": { | 90 | "miteco_data_territory": { | ||
| 77 | "es": "" | 91 | "es": "" | ||
| 78 | }, | 92 | }, | ||
| 79 | "miteco_dataset_type": | 93 | "miteco_dataset_type": | ||
| 80 | //publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/dataset-type/STATISTICAL", | 94 | //publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/dataset-type/STATISTICAL", | ||
| 81 | "miteco_geo_level": "1", | 95 | "miteco_geo_level": "1", | ||
| n | 82 | "modified": "2026-06-23", | n | 96 | "modified": "2026-06-25", |
| 83 | "name": "40e79341-3b87-5927-91ee-2dab140533f6", | 97 | "name": "40e79341-3b87-5927-91ee-2dab140533f6", | ||
| 84 | "notes": "The connectivity of protected areas, such as the Natura | 98 | "notes": "The connectivity of protected areas, such as the Natura | ||
| 85 | 2000 network, is crucial for maintaining healthy ecosystems and for | 99 | 2000 network, is crucial for maintaining healthy ecosystems and for | ||
| 86 | the delivery of ecosystem services into the wider landscapes in which | 100 | the delivery of ecosystem services into the wider landscapes in which | ||
| 87 | they are embedded. We here present a novel combination of methods for | 101 | they are embedded. We here present a novel combination of methods for | ||
| 88 | connectivity analysis across heterogeneous landscapes, integrating | 102 | connectivity analysis across heterogeneous landscapes, integrating | ||
| 89 | graph-based analyses, least-cost path modelling and the Probability of | 103 | graph-based analyses, least-cost path modelling and the Probability of | ||
| 90 | Connectivity metric, and apply these methods to the network of Natura | 104 | Connectivity metric, and apply these methods to the network of Natura | ||
| 91 | 2000 woodland sites in mainland Spain. We deliver key insights on the | 105 | 2000 woodland sites in mainland Spain. We deliver key insights on the | ||
| 92 | connectors between Natura 2000 sites: their location and width | 106 | connectors between Natura 2000 sites: their location and width | ||
| 93 | (including transboundary ones), their prioritization in conservation | 107 | (including transboundary ones), their prioritization in conservation | ||
| 94 | and restoration scenarios involving different land uses, and the | 108 | and restoration scenarios involving different land uses, and the | ||
| 95 | bottlenecks (weak points due to land use pressures) found along them. | 109 | bottlenecks (weak points due to land use pressures) found along them. | ||
| 96 | Based on these results, we characterize the landscapes traversed by | 110 | Based on these results, we characterize the landscapes traversed by | ||
| 97 | the connectors within and outside the protected sites to inform | 111 | the connectors within and outside the protected sites to inform | ||
| 98 | related land management decisions.\n We show that forests of public | 112 | related land management decisions.\n We show that forests of public | ||
| 99 | utility play a key role in sustaining Natura 2000 connectivity in | 113 | utility play a key role in sustaining Natura 2000 connectivity in | ||
| 100 | Spain. They may qualify as an effective area-based conservation | 114 | Spain. They may qualify as an effective area-based conservation | ||
| 101 | measure significantly contributing to the connectivity element of | 115 | measure significantly contributing to the connectivity element of | ||
| 102 | Aichi Target 11. Riparian forests were part of the identified | 116 | Aichi Target 11. Riparian forests were part of the identified | ||
| 103 | connectors much more frequently than expected by their area. They | 117 | connectors much more frequently than expected by their area. They | ||
| 104 | stand out as a crucial green infrastructure safeguarding the | 118 | stand out as a crucial green infrastructure safeguarding the | ||
| 105 | connectivity of Natura 2000 woodland habitats, particularly when | 119 | connectivity of Natura 2000 woodland habitats, particularly when | ||
| 106 | forest species need to traverse landscapes dominated by agricultural | 120 | forest species need to traverse landscapes dominated by agricultural | ||
| 107 | and artificial land uses.\n Natura 2000 sites have good connectivity | 121 | and artificial land uses.\n Natura 2000 sites have good connectivity | ||
| 108 | conditions compared to unprotected lands. First, the identified | 122 | conditions compared to unprotected lands. First, the identified | ||
| 109 | woodland connectors preferentially traversed Natura 2000 lands. | 123 | woodland connectors preferentially traversed Natura 2000 lands. | ||
| 110 | Second, the large majority of bottlenecks occurred outside Natura | 124 | Second, the large majority of bottlenecks occurred outside Natura | ||
| 111 | 2000. Natura 2000 sites cannot, however, be considered free from | 125 | 2000. Natura 2000 sites cannot, however, be considered free from | ||
| 112 | connectivity limitations; they still contained a significant number of | 126 | connectivity limitations; they still contained a significant number of | ||
| 113 | bottlenecks that would need to be addressed in the site-level | 127 | bottlenecks that would need to be addressed in the site-level | ||
| 114 | management plans.\n The priority connectors for conservation were | 128 | management plans.\n The priority connectors for conservation were | ||
| 115 | preferentially found in the well-forested and well-protected | 129 | preferentially found in the well-forested and well-protected | ||
| 116 | landscapes in the main mountain ranges of Spain. On the contrary, the | 130 | landscapes in the main mountain ranges of Spain. On the contrary, the | ||
| 117 | priority connectors for restoration traversed much more frequently | 131 | priority connectors for restoration traversed much more frequently | ||
| 118 | landscapes dominated by agriculture. In these landscapes, connectivity | 132 | landscapes dominated by agriculture. In these landscapes, connectivity | ||
| 119 | improvements largely depend on the restoration of riparian forests and | 133 | improvements largely depend on the restoration of riparian forests and | ||
| 120 | on measures that mitigate the intensification of agriculture by | 134 | on measures that mitigate the intensification of agriculture by | ||
| 121 | promoting landscape complexity and natural vegetation remnants. The | 135 | promoting landscape complexity and natural vegetation remnants. The | ||
| 122 | remarkable spatial segregation found between the priority landscapes | 136 | remarkable spatial segregation found between the priority landscapes | ||
| 123 | for connectivity conservation and those of priority for restoration | 137 | for connectivity conservation and those of priority for restoration | ||
| 124 | highlights the need for an integrated perspective for land use | 138 | highlights the need for an integrated perspective for land use | ||
| 125 | planning and for the management of the Natura 2000 network in | 139 | planning and for the management of the Natura 2000 network in | ||
| 126 | Europe.\n Palabras clave: Connectivity, Corridor, Forest, | 140 | Europe.\n Palabras clave: Connectivity, Corridor, Forest, | ||
| 127 | Infrastructure planning", | 141 | Infrastructure planning", | ||
| 128 | "notes_translated": { | 142 | "notes_translated": { | ||
| 129 | "en": "The connectivity of protected areas, such as the Natura | 143 | "en": "The connectivity of protected areas, such as the Natura | ||
| 130 | 2000 network, is crucial for maintaining healthy ecosystems and for | 144 | 2000 network, is crucial for maintaining healthy ecosystems and for | ||
| 131 | the delivery of ecosystem services into the wider landscapes in which | 145 | the delivery of ecosystem services into the wider landscapes in which | ||
| 132 | they are embedded. We here present a novel combination of methods for | 146 | they are embedded. We here present a novel combination of methods for | ||
| 133 | connectivity analysis across heterogeneous landscapes, integrating | 147 | connectivity analysis across heterogeneous landscapes, integrating | ||
| 134 | graph-based analyses, least-cost path modelling and the Probability of | 148 | graph-based analyses, least-cost path modelling and the Probability of | ||
| 135 | Connectivity metric, and apply these methods to the network of Natura | 149 | Connectivity metric, and apply these methods to the network of Natura | ||
| 136 | 2000 woodland sites in mainland Spain. We deliver key insights on the | 150 | 2000 woodland sites in mainland Spain. We deliver key insights on the | ||
| 137 | connectors between Natura 2000 sites: their location and width | 151 | connectors between Natura 2000 sites: their location and width | ||
| 138 | (including transboundary ones), their prioritization in conservation | 152 | (including transboundary ones), their prioritization in conservation | ||
| 139 | and restoration scenarios involving different land uses, and the | 153 | and restoration scenarios involving different land uses, and the | ||
| 140 | bottlenecks (weak points due to land use pressures) found along them. | 154 | bottlenecks (weak points due to land use pressures) found along them. | ||
| 141 | Based on these results, we characterize the landscapes traversed by | 155 | Based on these results, we characterize the landscapes traversed by | ||
| 142 | the connectors within and outside the protected sites to inform | 156 | the connectors within and outside the protected sites to inform | ||
| 143 | related land management decisions.\n We show that forests of public | 157 | related land management decisions.\n We show that forests of public | ||
| 144 | utility play a key role in sustaining Natura 2000 connectivity in | 158 | utility play a key role in sustaining Natura 2000 connectivity in | ||
| 145 | Spain. They may qualify as an effective area-based conservation | 159 | Spain. They may qualify as an effective area-based conservation | ||
| 146 | measure significantly contributing to the connectivity element of | 160 | measure significantly contributing to the connectivity element of | ||
| 147 | Aichi Target 11. Riparian forests were part of the identified | 161 | Aichi Target 11. Riparian forests were part of the identified | ||
| 148 | connectors much more frequently than expected by their area. They | 162 | connectors much more frequently than expected by their area. They | ||
| 149 | stand out as a crucial green infrastructure safeguarding the | 163 | stand out as a crucial green infrastructure safeguarding the | ||
| 150 | connectivity of Natura 2000 woodland habitats, particularly when | 164 | connectivity of Natura 2000 woodland habitats, particularly when | ||
| 151 | forest species need to traverse landscapes dominated by agricultural | 165 | forest species need to traverse landscapes dominated by agricultural | ||
| 152 | and artificial land uses.\n Natura 2000 sites have good connectivity | 166 | and artificial land uses.\n Natura 2000 sites have good connectivity | ||
| 153 | conditions compared to unprotected lands. First, the identified | 167 | conditions compared to unprotected lands. First, the identified | ||
| 154 | woodland connectors preferentially traversed Natura 2000 lands. | 168 | woodland connectors preferentially traversed Natura 2000 lands. | ||
| 155 | Second, the large majority of bottlenecks occurred outside Natura | 169 | Second, the large majority of bottlenecks occurred outside Natura | ||
| 156 | 2000. Natura 2000 sites cannot, however, be considered free from | 170 | 2000. Natura 2000 sites cannot, however, be considered free from | ||
| 157 | connectivity limitations; they still contained a significant number of | 171 | connectivity limitations; they still contained a significant number of | ||
| 158 | bottlenecks that would need to be addressed in the site-level | 172 | bottlenecks that would need to be addressed in the site-level | ||
| 159 | management plans.\n The priority connectors for conservation were | 173 | management plans.\n The priority connectors for conservation were | ||
| 160 | preferentially found in the well-forested and well-protected | 174 | preferentially found in the well-forested and well-protected | ||
| 161 | landscapes in the main mountain ranges of Spain. On the contrary, the | 175 | landscapes in the main mountain ranges of Spain. On the contrary, the | ||
| 162 | priority connectors for restoration traversed much more frequently | 176 | priority connectors for restoration traversed much more frequently | ||
| 163 | landscapes dominated by agriculture. In these landscapes, connectivity | 177 | landscapes dominated by agriculture. In these landscapes, connectivity | ||
| 164 | improvements largely depend on the restoration of riparian forests and | 178 | improvements largely depend on the restoration of riparian forests and | ||
| 165 | on measures that mitigate the intensification of agriculture by | 179 | on measures that mitigate the intensification of agriculture by | ||
| 166 | promoting landscape complexity and natural vegetation remnants. The | 180 | promoting landscape complexity and natural vegetation remnants. The | ||
| 167 | remarkable spatial segregation found between the priority landscapes | 181 | remarkable spatial segregation found between the priority landscapes | ||
| 168 | for connectivity conservation and those of priority for restoration | 182 | for connectivity conservation and those of priority for restoration | ||
| 169 | highlights the need for an integrated perspective for land use | 183 | highlights the need for an integrated perspective for land use | ||
| 170 | planning and for the management of the Natura 2000 network in | 184 | planning and for the management of the Natura 2000 network in | ||
| 171 | Europe.\n Palabras clave: Connectivity, Corridor, Forest, | 185 | Europe.\n Palabras clave: Connectivity, Corridor, Forest, | ||
| 172 | Infrastructure planning", | 186 | Infrastructure planning", | ||
| 173 | "es": "The connectivity of protected areas, such as the Natura | 187 | "es": "The connectivity of protected areas, such as the Natura | ||
| 174 | 2000 network, is crucial for maintaining healthy ecosystems and for | 188 | 2000 network, is crucial for maintaining healthy ecosystems and for | ||
| 175 | the delivery of ecosystem services into the wider landscapes in which | 189 | the delivery of ecosystem services into the wider landscapes in which | ||
| 176 | they are embedded. We here present a novel combination of methods for | 190 | they are embedded. We here present a novel combination of methods for | ||
| 177 | connectivity analysis across heterogeneous landscapes, integrating | 191 | connectivity analysis across heterogeneous landscapes, integrating | ||
| 178 | graph-based analyses, least-cost path modelling and the Probability of | 192 | graph-based analyses, least-cost path modelling and the Probability of | ||
| 179 | Connectivity metric, and apply these methods to the network of Natura | 193 | Connectivity metric, and apply these methods to the network of Natura | ||
| 180 | 2000 woodland sites in mainland Spain. We deliver key insights on the | 194 | 2000 woodland sites in mainland Spain. We deliver key insights on the | ||
| 181 | connectors between Natura 2000 sites: their location and width | 195 | connectors between Natura 2000 sites: their location and width | ||
| 182 | (including transboundary ones), their prioritization in conservation | 196 | (including transboundary ones), their prioritization in conservation | ||
| 183 | and restoration scenarios involving different land uses, and the | 197 | and restoration scenarios involving different land uses, and the | ||
| 184 | bottlenecks (weak points due to land use pressures) found along them. | 198 | bottlenecks (weak points due to land use pressures) found along them. | ||
| 185 | Based on these results, we characterize the landscapes traversed by | 199 | Based on these results, we characterize the landscapes traversed by | ||
| 186 | the connectors within and outside the protected sites to inform | 200 | the connectors within and outside the protected sites to inform | ||
| 187 | related land management decisions.\n We show that forests of public | 201 | related land management decisions.\n We show that forests of public | ||
| 188 | utility play a key role in sustaining Natura 2000 connectivity in | 202 | utility play a key role in sustaining Natura 2000 connectivity in | ||
| 189 | Spain. They may qualify as an effective area-based conservation | 203 | Spain. They may qualify as an effective area-based conservation | ||
| 190 | measure significantly contributing to the connectivity element of | 204 | measure significantly contributing to the connectivity element of | ||
| 191 | Aichi Target 11. Riparian forests were part of the identified | 205 | Aichi Target 11. Riparian forests were part of the identified | ||
| 192 | connectors much more frequently than expected by their area. They | 206 | connectors much more frequently than expected by their area. They | ||
| 193 | stand out as a crucial green infrastructure safeguarding the | 207 | stand out as a crucial green infrastructure safeguarding the | ||
| 194 | connectivity of Natura 2000 woodland habitats, particularly when | 208 | connectivity of Natura 2000 woodland habitats, particularly when | ||
| 195 | forest species need to traverse landscapes dominated by agricultural | 209 | forest species need to traverse landscapes dominated by agricultural | ||
| 196 | and artificial land uses.\n Natura 2000 sites have good connectivity | 210 | and artificial land uses.\n Natura 2000 sites have good connectivity | ||
| 197 | conditions compared to unprotected lands. First, the identified | 211 | conditions compared to unprotected lands. First, the identified | ||
| 198 | woodland connectors preferentially traversed Natura 2000 lands. | 212 | woodland connectors preferentially traversed Natura 2000 lands. | ||
| 199 | Second, the large majority of bottlenecks occurred outside Natura | 213 | Second, the large majority of bottlenecks occurred outside Natura | ||
| 200 | 2000. Natura 2000 sites cannot, however, be considered free from | 214 | 2000. Natura 2000 sites cannot, however, be considered free from | ||
| 201 | connectivity limitations; they still contained a significant number of | 215 | connectivity limitations; they still contained a significant number of | ||
| 202 | bottlenecks that would need to be addressed in the site-level | 216 | bottlenecks that would need to be addressed in the site-level | ||
| 203 | management plans.\n The priority connectors for conservation were | 217 | management plans.\n The priority connectors for conservation were | ||
| 204 | preferentially found in the well-forested and well-protected | 218 | preferentially found in the well-forested and well-protected | ||
| 205 | landscapes in the main mountain ranges of Spain. On the contrary, the | 219 | landscapes in the main mountain ranges of Spain. On the contrary, the | ||
| 206 | priority connectors for restoration traversed much more frequently | 220 | priority connectors for restoration traversed much more frequently | ||
| 207 | landscapes dominated by agriculture. In these landscapes, connectivity | 221 | landscapes dominated by agriculture. In these landscapes, connectivity | ||
| 208 | improvements largely depend on the restoration of riparian forests and | 222 | improvements largely depend on the restoration of riparian forests and | ||
| 209 | on measures that mitigate the intensification of agriculture by | 223 | on measures that mitigate the intensification of agriculture by | ||
| 210 | promoting landscape complexity and natural vegetation remnants. The | 224 | promoting landscape complexity and natural vegetation remnants. The | ||
| 211 | remarkable spatial segregation found between the priority landscapes | 225 | remarkable spatial segregation found between the priority landscapes | ||
| 212 | for connectivity conservation and those of priority for restoration | 226 | for connectivity conservation and those of priority for restoration | ||
| 213 | highlights the need for an integrated perspective for land use | 227 | highlights the need for an integrated perspective for land use | ||
| 214 | planning and for the management of the Natura 2000 network in | 228 | planning and for the management of the Natura 2000 network in | ||
| 215 | Europe.\n Palabras clave: Connectivity, Corridor, Forest, | 229 | Europe.\n Palabras clave: Connectivity, Corridor, Forest, | ||
| 216 | Infrastructure planning" | 230 | Infrastructure planning" | ||
| 217 | }, | 231 | }, | ||
| 218 | "num_resources": 1, | 232 | "num_resources": 1, | ||
| 219 | "num_tags": 6, | 233 | "num_tags": 6, | ||
| 220 | "organization": { | 234 | "organization": { | ||
| 221 | "approval_status": "approved", | 235 | "approval_status": "approved", | ||
| 222 | "created": "2026-06-23T14:36:08.942021", | 236 | "created": "2026-06-23T14:36:08.942021", | ||
| 223 | "description": "", | 237 | "description": "", | ||
| 224 | "id": "bca483f7-26e2-4ed8-99e8-65f5b3c7a26e", | 238 | "id": "bca483f7-26e2-4ed8-99e8-65f5b3c7a26e", | ||
| 225 | "image_url": "", | 239 | "image_url": "", | ||
| 226 | "is_organization": true, | 240 | "is_organization": true, | ||
| 227 | "name": "iepnb", | 241 | "name": "iepnb", | ||
| 228 | "state": "active", | 242 | "state": "active", | ||
| 229 | "title": "", | 243 | "title": "", | ||
| 230 | "type": "organization" | 244 | "type": "organization" | ||
| 231 | }, | 245 | }, | ||
| 232 | "owner_org": "bca483f7-26e2-4ed8-99e8-65f5b3c7a26e", | 246 | "owner_org": "bca483f7-26e2-4ed8-99e8-65f5b3c7a26e", | ||
| 233 | "private": false, | 247 | "private": false, | ||
| 234 | "provenance": { | 248 | "provenance": { | ||
| 235 | "en": "", | 249 | "en": "", | ||
| 236 | "es": "" | 250 | "es": "" | ||
| 237 | }, | 251 | }, | ||
| 238 | "publisher": [ | 252 | "publisher": [ | ||
| 239 | { | 253 | { | ||
| 240 | "email": "buzon-bdatos@miteco.es", | 254 | "email": "buzon-bdatos@miteco.es", | ||
| 241 | "name": "\u00c1rea de Banco de Datos de la Naturaleza. | 255 | "name": "\u00c1rea de Banco de Datos de la Naturaleza. | ||
| 242 | Direcci\u00f3n General Biodiversidad, Bosques y Desertificaci\u00f3n. | 256 | Direcci\u00f3n General Biodiversidad, Bosques y Desertificaci\u00f3n. | ||
| 243 | Ministerio para la Transici\u00f3n Ecol\u00f3gica y el Reto | 257 | Ministerio para la Transici\u00f3n Ecol\u00f3gica y el Reto | ||
| 244 | Demogr\u00e1fico", | 258 | Demogr\u00e1fico", | ||
| 245 | "type": "http://purl.org/adms/publishertype/NationalAuthority", | 259 | "type": "http://purl.org/adms/publishertype/NationalAuthority", | ||
| 246 | "uri": "https://iepnb.es/catalogo/organization/iepnb", | 260 | "uri": "https://iepnb.es/catalogo/organization/iepnb", | ||
| 247 | "url": "https://www.miteco.gob.es/" | 261 | "url": "https://www.miteco.gob.es/" | ||
| 248 | } | 262 | } | ||
| 249 | ], | 263 | ], | ||
| 250 | "publisher_email": "buzon-bdatos@miteco.es", | 264 | "publisher_email": "buzon-bdatos@miteco.es", | ||
| 251 | "publisher_name": "\u00c1rea de Banco de Datos de la Naturaleza. | 265 | "publisher_name": "\u00c1rea de Banco de Datos de la Naturaleza. | ||
| 252 | Direcci\u00f3n General Biodiversidad, Bosques y Desertificaci\u00f3n. | 266 | Direcci\u00f3n General Biodiversidad, Bosques y Desertificaci\u00f3n. | ||
| 253 | Ministerio para la Transici\u00f3n Ecol\u00f3gica y el Reto | 267 | Ministerio para la Transici\u00f3n Ecol\u00f3gica y el Reto | ||
| 254 | Demogr\u00e1fico", | 268 | Demogr\u00e1fico", | ||
| 255 | "publisher_type": | 269 | "publisher_type": | ||
| 256 | "http://purl.org/adms/publishertype/NationalAuthority", | 270 | "http://purl.org/adms/publishertype/NationalAuthority", | ||
| 257 | "publisher_uri": "https://iepnb.es/catalogo/organization/iepnb", | 271 | "publisher_uri": "https://iepnb.es/catalogo/organization/iepnb", | ||
| 258 | "publisher_url": "https://www.miteco.gob.es/", | 272 | "publisher_url": "https://www.miteco.gob.es/", | ||
| 259 | "purpose": { | 273 | "purpose": { | ||
| 260 | "en": "", | 274 | "en": "", | ||
| 261 | "es": "" | 275 | "es": "" | ||
| 262 | }, | 276 | }, | ||
| 263 | "reference": [], | 277 | "reference": [], | ||
| 264 | "relationships_as_object": [], | 278 | "relationships_as_object": [], | ||
| 265 | "relationships_as_subject": [], | 279 | "relationships_as_subject": [], | ||
| 266 | "resources": [ | 280 | "resources": [ | ||
| 267 | { | 281 | { | ||
| 268 | "access_url": | 282 | "access_url": | ||
| 269 | 5927-91ee-2dab140533f6/resource/a57c9bcc-e449-4f78-915f-ae70186350e0", | 283 | 5927-91ee-2dab140533f6/resource/a57c9bcc-e449-4f78-915f-ae70186350e0", | ||
| 270 | "availability": | 284 | "availability": | ||
| 271 | ications.europa.eu/resource/authority/planned-availability/AVAILABLE", | 285 | ications.europa.eu/resource/authority/planned-availability/AVAILABLE", | ||
| 272 | "cache_last_updated": null, | 286 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||
| 273 | "cache_url": null, | 287 | "cache_url": null, | ||
| 274 | "created": "2018-06-01T00:00:00", | 288 | "created": "2018-06-01T00:00:00", | ||
| 275 | "dataset_id": "ab2267fb-4737-460b-b01d-50e722f0bf60", | 289 | "dataset_id": "ab2267fb-4737-460b-b01d-50e722f0bf60", | ||
| 276 | "datastore_active": false, | 290 | "datastore_active": false, | ||
| 277 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | 291 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | ||
| 278 | "description": "Revista", | 292 | "description": "Revista", | ||
| 279 | "download_url": | 293 | "download_url": | ||
| 280 | ps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837717302764", | 294 | ps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837717302764", | ||
| 281 | "encoding": "UTF-8", | 295 | "encoding": "UTF-8", | ||
| 282 | "format": "HTML", | 296 | "format": "HTML", | ||
| 283 | "hash": "", | 297 | "hash": "", | ||
| 284 | "id": "a57c9bcc-e449-4f78-915f-ae70186350e0", | 298 | "id": "a57c9bcc-e449-4f78-915f-ae70186350e0", | ||
| 285 | "issued": "", | 299 | "issued": "", | ||
| 286 | "language": | 300 | "language": | ||
| 287 | "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/language/ENG", | 301 | "http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/language/ENG", | ||
| 288 | "last_modified": null, | 302 | "last_modified": null, | ||
| 289 | "license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", | 303 | "license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", | ||
| 290 | "license_id": "cc-by", | 304 | "license_id": "cc-by", | ||
| n | 291 | "metadata_modified": "2026-06-23T16:09:40.584810", | n | 305 | "metadata_modified": "2026-06-25T12:39:47.339079", |
| 292 | "mimetype": | 306 | "mimetype": | ||
| 293 | "https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/text/html", | 307 | "https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/text/html", | ||
| 294 | "mimetype_inner": null, | 308 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||
| t | 295 | "modified": "2026-06-23", | t | 309 | "modified": "2026-06-25", |
| 296 | "name": "Acceso al recurso", | 310 | "name": "Acceso al recurso", | ||
| 297 | "package_id": "40e79341-3b87-5927-91ee-2dab140533f6", | 311 | "package_id": "40e79341-3b87-5927-91ee-2dab140533f6", | ||
| 298 | "position": 0, | 312 | "position": 0, | ||
| 299 | "protocol": null, | 313 | "protocol": null, | ||
| 300 | "resource_type": null, | 314 | "resource_type": null, | ||
| 301 | "rights": | 315 | "rights": | ||
| 302 | .europa.eu/metadata-codelist/LimitationsOnPublicAccess/noLimitations", | 316 | .europa.eu/metadata-codelist/LimitationsOnPublicAccess/noLimitations", | ||
| 303 | "size": 0, | 317 | "size": 0, | ||
| 304 | "state": "active", | 318 | "state": "active", | ||
| 305 | "status": "http://purl.org/adms/status/Completed", | 319 | "status": "http://purl.org/adms/status/Completed", | ||
| 306 | "url": | 320 | "url": | ||
| 307 | ps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837717302764", | 321 | ps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837717302764", | ||
| 308 | "url_type": null | 322 | "url_type": null | ||
| 309 | } | 323 | } | ||
| 310 | ], | 324 | ], | ||
| 311 | "schemingdcat_xls_metadata_template": false, | 325 | "schemingdcat_xls_metadata_template": false, | ||
| 312 | "source": "", | 326 | "source": "", | ||
| 313 | "spatial": "{\"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [[[-18.16, | 327 | "spatial": "{\"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [[[-18.16, | ||
| 314 | 27.64], [4.32, 27.64], [4.32, 43.79], [-18.16, 43.79], [-18.16, | 328 | 27.64], [4.32, 27.64], [4.32, 43.79], [-18.16, 43.79], [-18.16, | ||
| 315 | 27.64]]]}", | 329 | 27.64]]]}", | ||
| 316 | "spatial_coverage": [ | 330 | "spatial_coverage": [ | ||
| 317 | { | 331 | { | ||
| 318 | "bbox": "{\"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [[[-18.16, | 332 | "bbox": "{\"type\": \"Polygon\", \"coordinates\": [[[-18.16, | ||
| 319 | 27.64], [4.32, 27.64], [4.32, 43.79], [-18.16, 43.79], [-18.16, | 333 | 27.64], [4.32, 27.64], [4.32, 43.79], [-18.16, 43.79], [-18.16, | ||
| 320 | 27.64]]]}", | 334 | 27.64]]]}", | ||
| 321 | "centroid": "{\"type\": \"Point\", \"coordinates\": [-6.92, | 335 | "centroid": "{\"type\": \"Point\", \"coordinates\": [-6.92, | ||
| 322 | 35.715]}", | 336 | 35.715]}", | ||
| 323 | "text": "Espa\u00f1a", | 337 | "text": "Espa\u00f1a", | ||
| 324 | "uri": | 338 | "uri": | ||
| 325 | ttp://datos.gob.es/recurso/sector-publico/territorio/Pais/Espa\u00f1a" | 339 | ttp://datos.gob.es/recurso/sector-publico/territorio/Pais/Espa\u00f1a" | ||
| 326 | } | 340 | } | ||
| 327 | ], | 341 | ], | ||
| 328 | "spatial_resolution_in_meters": "", | 342 | "spatial_resolution_in_meters": "", | ||
| 329 | "spatial_uri": | 343 | "spatial_uri": | ||
| 330 | tp://datos.gob.es/recurso/sector-publico/territorio/Pais/Espa\u00f1a", | 344 | tp://datos.gob.es/recurso/sector-publico/territorio/Pais/Espa\u00f1a", | ||
| 331 | "state": "active", | 345 | "state": "active", | ||
| 332 | "study_variables": { | 346 | "study_variables": { | ||
| 333 | "es": "" | 347 | "es": "" | ||
| 334 | }, | 348 | }, | ||
| 335 | "tag_uri": [ | 349 | "tag_uri": [ | ||
| 336 | 350 | ||||
| 337 | tp://inspire.ec.europa.eu/metadata-codelist/TopicCategory/environment" | 351 | tp://inspire.ec.europa.eu/metadata-codelist/TopicCategory/environment" | ||
| 338 | ], | 352 | ], | ||
| 339 | "tags": [ | 353 | "tags": [ | ||
| 340 | { | 354 | { | ||
| 341 | "display_name": "bosque", | 355 | "display_name": "bosque", | ||
| 342 | "id": "47b2aa2a-4cbb-4d71-8ce0-bc0963af6f84", | 356 | "id": "47b2aa2a-4cbb-4d71-8ce0-bc0963af6f84", | ||
| 343 | "name": "bosque", | 357 | "name": "bosque", | ||
| 344 | "state": "active", | 358 | "state": "active", | ||
| 345 | "vocabulary_id": null | 359 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
| 346 | }, | 360 | }, | ||
| 347 | { | 361 | { | ||
| 348 | "display_name": "conectividad", | 362 | "display_name": "conectividad", | ||
| 349 | "id": "e6d6aac0-6fce-40b0-94ea-4e383a4c91cc", | 363 | "id": "e6d6aac0-6fce-40b0-94ea-4e383a4c91cc", | ||
| 350 | "name": "conectividad", | 364 | "name": "conectividad", | ||
| 351 | "state": "active", | 365 | "state": "active", | ||
| 352 | "vocabulary_id": null | 366 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
| 353 | }, | 367 | }, | ||
| 354 | { | 368 | { | ||
| 355 | "display_name": "corredor", | 369 | "display_name": "corredor", | ||
| 356 | "id": "0ffaf760-b796-4288-8299-56ac6fdb666a", | 370 | "id": "0ffaf760-b796-4288-8299-56ac6fdb666a", | ||
| 357 | "name": "corredor", | 371 | "name": "corredor", | ||
| 358 | "state": "active", | 372 | "state": "active", | ||
| 359 | "vocabulary_id": null | 373 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
| 360 | }, | 374 | }, | ||
| 361 | { | 375 | { | ||
| 362 | "display_name": "fragmentacion", | 376 | "display_name": "fragmentacion", | ||
| 363 | "id": "627f9c0a-a199-4c69-b563-0c8d626e3194", | 377 | "id": "627f9c0a-a199-4c69-b563-0c8d626e3194", | ||
| 364 | "name": "fragmentacion", | 378 | "name": "fragmentacion", | ||
| 365 | "state": "active", | 379 | "state": "active", | ||
| 366 | "vocabulary_id": null | 380 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
| 367 | }, | 381 | }, | ||
| 368 | { | 382 | { | ||
| 369 | "display_name": "otros-recursos-que-incluyen-informacion-", | 383 | "display_name": "otros-recursos-que-incluyen-informacion-", | ||
| 370 | "id": "2b3610b7-85fe-495c-990a-40e99a432df1", | 384 | "id": "2b3610b7-85fe-495c-990a-40e99a432df1", | ||
| 371 | "name": "otros-recursos-que-incluyen-informacion-", | 385 | "name": "otros-recursos-que-incluyen-informacion-", | ||
| 372 | "state": "active", | 386 | "state": "active", | ||
| 373 | "vocabulary_id": null | 387 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
| 374 | }, | 388 | }, | ||
| 375 | { | 389 | { | ||
| 376 | "display_name": "planificacion-de-infraestructuras", | 390 | "display_name": "planificacion-de-infraestructuras", | ||
| 377 | "id": "735095bd-d86d-4351-a078-4924cedac902", | 391 | "id": "735095bd-d86d-4351-a078-4924cedac902", | ||
| 378 | "name": "planificacion-de-infraestructuras", | 392 | "name": "planificacion-de-infraestructuras", | ||
| 379 | "state": "active", | 393 | "state": "active", | ||
| 380 | "vocabulary_id": null | 394 | "vocabulary_id": null | ||
| 381 | } | 395 | } | ||
| 382 | ], | 396 | ], | ||
| 383 | "thematic_area": [ | 397 | "thematic_area": [ | ||
| 384 | "especies_silvestres" | 398 | "especies_silvestres" | ||
| 385 | ], | 399 | ], | ||
| 386 | "theme_es": [ | 400 | "theme_es": [ | ||
| 387 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/medio-ambiente" | 401 | "http://datos.gob.es/kos/sector-publico/sector/medio-ambiente" | ||
| 388 | ], | 402 | ], | ||
| 389 | "title": "Natura 2000 sites, public forests and riparian corridors: | 403 | "title": "Natura 2000 sites, public forests and riparian corridors: | ||
| 390 | the connectivity backbone of forest green infrastructure.", | 404 | the connectivity backbone of forest green infrastructure.", | ||
| 391 | "title_translated": { | 405 | "title_translated": { | ||
| 392 | "en": "", | 406 | "en": "", | ||
| 393 | "es": "Natura 2000 sites, public forests and riparian corridors: | 407 | "es": "Natura 2000 sites, public forests and riparian corridors: | ||
| 394 | the connectivity backbone of forest green infrastructure." | 408 | the connectivity backbone of forest green infrastructure." | ||
| 395 | }, | 409 | }, | ||
| 396 | "topic": | 410 | "topic": | ||
| 397 | "http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/metadata-codelist/TopicCategory/biota", | 411 | "http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/metadata-codelist/TopicCategory/biota", | ||
| 398 | "type": "dataset", | 412 | "type": "dataset", | ||
| 399 | "url": | 413 | "url": | ||
| 400 | //iepnb.es:443/catalogo/dataset/40e79341-3b87-5927-91ee-2dab140533f6", | 414 | //iepnb.es:443/catalogo/dataset/40e79341-3b87-5927-91ee-2dab140533f6", | ||
| 401 | "version": "", | 415 | "version": "", | ||
| 402 | "version_notes": { | 416 | "version_notes": { | ||
| 403 | "en": "", | 417 | "en": "", | ||
| 404 | "es": "" | 418 | "es": "" | ||
| 405 | } | 419 | } | ||
| 406 | } | 420 | } |